Making documentaries is a challenging and rewarding career. Many filmmakers fall into the trap of creating the "talking heads" documentary in which interview people just decorations or artistic interest. However, this form of documentation leaves much to be desired. The key is that "talking heads" are boring to watch. If people are only going to talk about their experiences, and an account of the situation in written form would be a much better idea because people used to write much better than words. There will be no "ums" or awkward pauses.
The art of making a documentary film is the process to "see" and not "tell". For example, rather than having someone explain the definition of poverty, why not show poverty. The public is smart enough to draw their own conclusions and definitions. What about filming in neighborhoods where poverty is rampant. What about showing the lives of people living in poverty. Their long bus rides to work, what they eat for dinner, what they struggle with and so on.
Film is a visual medium and people watch movies to have their visual senses peaked. You just need to see someone talk is not visually entertaining. It can be an aurally, but if it is interesting to the ear, then you should write a book instead of a film. You must make your documentary interesting to the eye
However, that does not mean "talking heads" should be removed completely. They can be large to explain the issue too complex to fill the holes in the information that you can not "show" and not "say" and can provide an explanation or help to save his thesis film on the basis of validation their powers. The point is simply used sparingly.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/894245
Making documentary films is a challenging and rewarding career path. Too many documentary filmmakers into the trap of creating a "Talking Heads" documentary, where you simply interview people in an interesting background or artistic. This form of making a documentary film leaves much to be desired. The most important thing is that the "Talking Heads" are boring to watch. If people are only going to talk about their experiences, so the situation with regard to the written form would be a much better idea, because people tend to give much more than talk. It should not be "UMS", or awkward pauses.
Art of the documentary film is a process of "show" rather than "tell." For example, instead of the person to explain the definition of poverty, why not see poverty. The public is smart enough to draw their own conclusions and definitions. What about filming the residential areas, where poverty is rampant. How about viewing live in poverty. They ran down the bus to work, what they eat dinner, what they're fighting, and so on.
Film is a visual medium and people watch movies to have their visual senses peaked. You just need to see someone talk is not visually entertaining. It can be an aurally, but if it is interesting to the ear, then you should write a book instead of a film. You must make your documentary interesting to the eye
But that's not to say that "Talking Heads" should be eliminated all together. They can be large to explain the topic too complex to address gaps in information that you might not "see" and not "say" and they can provide back-up explanations or help give your films validation specialized based on their credentials. The point is simply to use them sparingly.
sourceThe art of making a documentary film is the process to "see" and not "tell". For example, rather than having someone explain the definition of poverty, why not show poverty. The public is smart enough to draw their own conclusions and definitions. What about filming in neighborhoods where poverty is rampant. What about showing the lives of people living in poverty. Their long bus rides to work, what they eat for dinner, what they struggle with and so on.
Film is a visual medium and people watch movies to have their visual senses peaked. You just need to see someone talk is not visually entertaining. It can be an aurally, but if it is interesting to the ear, then you should write a book instead of a film. You must make your documentary interesting to the eye
However, that does not mean "talking heads" should be removed completely. They can be large to explain the issue too complex to fill the holes in the information that you can not "show" and not "say" and can provide an explanation or help to save his thesis film on the basis of validation their powers. The point is simply used sparingly.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/894245
Making documentary films is a challenging and rewarding career path. Too many documentary filmmakers into the trap of creating a "Talking Heads" documentary, where you simply interview people in an interesting background or artistic. This form of making a documentary film leaves much to be desired. The most important thing is that the "Talking Heads" are boring to watch. If people are only going to talk about their experiences, so the situation with regard to the written form would be a much better idea, because people tend to give much more than talk. It should not be "UMS", or awkward pauses.
Art of the documentary film is a process of "show" rather than "tell." For example, instead of the person to explain the definition of poverty, why not see poverty. The public is smart enough to draw their own conclusions and definitions. What about filming the residential areas, where poverty is rampant. How about viewing live in poverty. They ran down the bus to work, what they eat dinner, what they're fighting, and so on.
Film is a visual medium and people watch movies to have their visual senses peaked. You just need to see someone talk is not visually entertaining. It can be an aurally, but if it is interesting to the ear, then you should write a book instead of a film. You must make your documentary interesting to the eye
But that's not to say that "Talking Heads" should be eliminated all together. They can be large to explain the topic too complex to address gaps in information that you might not "see" and not "say" and they can provide back-up explanations or help give your films validation specialized based on their credentials. The point is simply to use them sparingly.
No comments:
Post a Comment